Status and uptime monitoring · cost comparison
Atlassian Statuspage vs self-hosted Uptime Kuma: what each actually costs
Atlassian Statuspage on the Startup tier against Uptime Kuma running on the smallest server that fits it. Every figure below is computed from the sizing model and the dated prices at the foot of this page, and includes the part most comparisons leave out: your own time.
At 10 people, self-hosting Uptime Kuma costs $44.70 a month against $99.00 for Atlassian Statuspage. You are ahead after 3 months and $1,805 better off over 36 months, with your own time already priced in.
- Atlassian Statuspage
- $99.00per month, Startup
- Self-hosted
- $44.70server, backups and your time
- Server and backups
- $7.20Basic 1 GiB, 1 GB RAM
- 36-month difference
- $1,805 saved by self-hosting
- Break-even
- 3 monthsafter $150 of setup time
The same comparison at every team size
Self-hosting has a floor and almost no slope, while per-seat software has no floor and a steep slope. That is the whole story, and it is why the answer flips somewhere in this table rather than being the same for everyone.
| Team size | Atlassian Statuspage | Self-hosted | Without valuing your time | Server needed | 36-month difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| solo | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 5 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 10 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 25 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 50 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 100 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
| 250 people | $99.00 | $44.70 | $7.20 | Basic 1 GiB (1 GB) | +$1,805 |
The balance tips in favour of self-hosting at around solo.
Where the self-hosted money actually goes at 10 people
| Line item | Per month | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Server | $6.00 | Basic 1 GiB at DigitalOcean: 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 25 GB disk |
| Backups | $1.20 | Provider snapshots at 20% of the server price. Skipping this is not a saving, it is a bet. |
| Your time | $37.50 | 0.5 hours a month of updates, upgrades and the occasional broken thing, at $75 an hour |
| Total | $44.70 | Plus $150 once, for roughly 2 hours of first-time setup |
Atlassian Statuspage at this size costs $99.00 a month. Atlassian Statuspage Startup is a flat $99.00 a month at this tier, independent of seat count.
Read this before you price anything
A free tier covers 100 subscribers, 25 components and two team members. Below that ceiling there is nothing to save.
What Uptime Kuma needs to run at 10 people
One container with SQLite. Cost scales with the number of monitors and their check interval, not with the number of people reading the dashboard.
| Resource | Required | How it is derived |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 0.6 GB | 0.5 GB for the stack at rest, plus 1 MB per active user, plus 25% headroom |
| Disk | 5.1 GB | 5 GB base, plus 0.01 GB per user |
| vCPU | 1 | The project's own baseline. For this workload memory runs out before the processor does. |
These base figures are an estimate. Uptime Kuma does not publish a minimum specification we could cite, so the base memory and disk are derived from the services in its own reference Docker Compose file. Treat them as a starting point and watch the first week of metrics.
What you give up, stated plainly
- Uptime is now yours. Atlassian Statuspage has an operations team on call. Self-hosted, a failed upgrade at 18:00 on a Friday is your evening.
- Backups only exist if you test restoring them. The $1.20 line above buys snapshots, not a rehearsed recovery.
- Uptime Kuma is a light lift: one container and no scheduled work beyond image updates. That is why the maintenance line is 0.5 hours a month rather than zero.
- Feature parity is never exact. Uptime Kuma covers the core of what teams use Atlassian Statuspage for; the long tail of integrations and enterprise controls is where the gap shows.
Where to put Uptime Kuma
0.6 GB of memory and 5.1 GB of disk is what this needs at 10 people. The cheapest plan that fits, among the providers whose prices we have read ourselves, is the Basic 1 GiB at DigitalOcean for $6.00 a month.
Go to DigitalOcean Compare hosts
We are not claiming this is the cheapest server on the internet. It is the cheapest one we can honestly quote. Hetzner Cloud, Vultr and PikaPods publish prices we could not read programmatically, and Hetzner in particular is usually cheaper per gigabyte of memory than anything quoted above. Price them yourself before you commit.
The DigitalOcean link above is a referral link: if you sign up through it and pay your first $25, we receive $25 of DigitalOcean account credit. That never changes the computed costs, which server is chosen, or the conclusion of this page. The sizing model and every price source are published in full.
Uptime Kuma at a glance
| Licence | MIT License |
|---|---|
| Written in | JavaScript |
| GitHub stars | 91,286, checked 2026-09-12 |
| Latest release | 2.5.4 |
| Last commit | 2026-09-12 |
| Ships Docker images | Yes |
| Project | uptime.kuma.pet · louislam/uptime-kuma |
Every figure on this page, and where it came from
| Input | Value used | Source | Read on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Statuspage Startup | USD 99.00 per month | vendor pricing page | 2026-09-12 |
| DigitalOcean Basic 1 GiB | $6.00 per month | provider pricing page | 2026-09-12 |
| Engineer time | $75 per hour | our published assumption | — |
| Uptime Kuma sizing | 0.5 GB base, 1 MB per user | derived from its reference Compose stack | — |
Prices move. If the vendor has changed theirs since 2026-09-12, the figures above are stale and the source links are the authority, not us. How we handle that.